After my last hate-entry from April 2015 about Star Wars (my estimation was not really far from the truth so to say), I decided to turn my blog to a research one. Things went in an unexpected direction and beginning with September last year I am a Ph.D. candidate in anthropology once again. As we say here - old love never rusts. After my failed attempt at a Ph.D., I could not resist the temptation and I am head over heels with anthropology again. To be honest, I never gave it up during my hiatus after my previous Ph.D had unsuccessfully ended. But this time there are deadlines. There is one more change. I am not in Pilsen anymore. This time I am at the Charles University in Prague. The Erasmus year I spent in Durham (UK) as a part of my previous Ph.D. turned out to be more subversive than I had expected. You can read an article summing up my experience (hence the title and the label Švejkian anthropology). This finally brings me to the topic of my current Ph.D. ...
Scroll down for the Czech version On Thursday this week I took part in a discussion wonderfully organized by students from Department of Ethnology at Charles University. The topic of the discussion was ethnology, its methods and aims. There were two key speakers - both distinguished Czech ethnologists. Since anthropology has been one of the main rivals of local ethnology, the discussion slid into a debate about differences between the two. Some participants expressed their distrust of social and cultural anthropology. There were many arguments, but I would like to focus on only one of them: Since the publication of Writing Culture (in 1986), anthropology has been rather immersed in the inner self of the anthropologist’s subjectivity rather than interested in the outside world, and that nothing worth reading, maybe except for one book, has been published in anthropology! For all those who agree with this opinion and ostentatiously show their ignorance I have a list ...
My book was honoured by the first review ever! The title for being the first to review An Ethnographic Chiefdom goes to Veronika Pehe, a Czech historian working at the Institute of Contemporary History at the Czech Academy of Sciences. She is an expert on socialism, postsocialism and Czech(oslovak) popular culture. Veronika is currently working on a research on early nineties' entrepreneurs. The title also goes to Czech Journal of Contemporary History , where the review was published. Veronika's amiable, yet thorough review summarises the central points of my book and offers some critical remarks on the viability of my approach. So, if you are looking for an extended summary of my book written by a human reader, visit https://sd.usd.cas.cz/corproofs.php .
Comments
Post a Comment